Shopping Cart

News — dissolution testing

Hydrodynamic Effects of Resident vs Manual Probes/Cannula

Posted by Pam Bialiy on

Hydrodynamic Effects of Resident vs Manual Probes/Cannula

The following article has been authored by John Heaney. Does the presence of a resident sampling probe affect the hydrodynamics of a dissolution vessel?  Yes, yes it does.  The more important questions are how strong is the change in the hydrodynamics and is it strong enough to affect testing? USP <1092>, an advisory chapter addresses this directly with:  Sampling probes may or may not remain in the vessel throughout the entire run. Sampling probes or fiber-optic probes can disturb the hydrodynamics of the vessel; therefore, adequate validation should be performed to ensure that the probes are not causing a significant...

Read more →


Why use Apex Vessels?

Posted by Pam Bialiy on

Why use Apex Vessels?

The following article has been authored by John Heaney.  Coning of disintegrating dosage forms is fairly common when using Apparatus 2 (Paddles) to perform dissolution testing.  The reason for this is the spinning of the paddle causes a cone shaped zone to form directly beneath it where there is low hydrodynamic activity.  In other words, it’s a bit of a dead zone where the stirring has little effect, and the particles are allowed to settle. Depending on the formulation this coning can be problematic.  It can prevent drug from dissolving in the media due to a reduction in the effective...

Read more →


ASTM/Enhanced Mechanical Calibration vs Prednisone PVT- Which is better for my lab?

Posted by Pam Bialiy on

The following article has been authored by John Heaney.   The debate about the prednisone performance verification test (PVT) versus the ASTM enhanced mechanical calibration has gone on since the inception of ASTM chapter 2503.  Both are different means of providing an answer to the same question,” Is my dissolution tester suitable for use and can I trust the data from it?” The prednisone PVT is typically performed after a mechanical qualification of the dissolution tester which, if one follows USP 711, has wider tolerances for passing than ASTM 2503.  However, if one follows the suggestions in USP Guideline on...

Read more →


Impact on Vibration in Dissolution Testing and why isn’t there a specification for it yet?

Posted by Pam Bialiy on

Impact on Vibration in Dissolution Testing and why isn’t there a specification for it yet?

The following article has been authored by John Heaney.   The USP chapter <711> says that dissolution testers should be free of any noticeable vibration.  While the chapter technically addresses the issue, it’s a far cry from the detail of the standards laid out for vessels, paddles, and baskets.  The reason for this likely lies with vibration itself. Vibration has both frequency and amplitude and those can be varied over a near limitless range. Sound is one of the most common forms of vibration that most people deal with on a day-to-day basis and is a good example of how...

Read more →


How to Choose a Sinker

Posted by Pam Bialiy on

How to Choose a Sinker

The following article has been authored by John Heaney. While determining if a sinker is needed is easy; determining what type of sinker needed may be less obvious.  USP <711> does allow for sinkers made from twists of inert wire.  This can be especially handy for R&D where the method is being developed and an experiment is being run to see if the sinkers provide more consistency to the results.  For use in other environments, such as QC, it would require the users to be trained on the correct length of inert wire to cut, as well as the spacing...

Read more →